Metamask: Unable to Estimate Gas When Calling withdraw Function in Solidity Contract on Polygon Network

Metamask: Unable to evaluate gas by calling the “Reclaim” function in the solidarity contract in a polygonal network

As the creator of the Blockchain -based intellectual contract, the factors that may affect the performance and efficiency of your contract may be taken into account. One critical aspect is the evaluation of gas consumption, especially when you call to “take back” the function. In this article, we will investigate why MetamK can fight gas assessment for removing the funds from your strength contract on a polygonal network.

Why Metamka Fight

Metamk is a popular platform that allows consumers to operate their cryptocurrency assets on several networks, including Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain (BSC) and polygons. By calling to “pick up” the feature in your strength contract using a Metamask polygonal network, you may face gas consumption assessment issues.

The reason for this issue is how solidarity contracts are concluded and executed in a polygonal network. Ethereum’s virtual machine (EVM) is a virtual machine that runs the solidness code, but it is not the same as EVM used in a polygonal network.

Gas ​​Rating and EVM Compatibility

Evaluate gas consumption due to an intellectual contract requires several factors including:

1

2.

3.

Solidity most features are called a “call” instruction that performs the function directly EVM. However, using the Metamk to call to “pick up” the function on the polygon network, you need to consider the following:

* A set of instructions

Metamask: Unable to Estimate Gas When Calling withdraw Function in Solidity Contract on Polygon Network

: Ethereum instructions (EIS) are used in a polygonal network, but it is not identical to EVM ISA.

* GAS COSTS

: Due to retreat function gas consumption estimates different from EVM.

Metamisk restrictions

To overcome these challenges, MetamK presents several solutions:

1

2.

  • ** Calling to “Receive” the function directly from the Metamask.

Conclusion

While it is possible to overcome these challenges using third party tools or by optimizing your code, the MetamK can fight the gas consumption assessment to withdraw funds from your strength contract in the polygonal network. If you are experiencing gas rating problems, consider investigating alternative solutions or contacting the Polygon Network support team to get help.

Recommendations

To improve your success options, make sure:

1

2.

  • Call the “retreat” function directly from the Metamask : Use Eth_sendrawtransaction to send the operation and call the contract to “Reclaim”.

As part of these recommendations, you can improve your success options when you call to “pick up” the function in your strength contract on the polygon network.

risk management arbitrum

Comments are closed.