Ethereum: Compensation with a side diameter with child-parents? Comparison
Ethereum Blockchain is known for its innovative solutions to complex problems, including transaction fees that can prevent or reject events. In recent years, two prominent suggestions have been made: ear-by-fee (RBF) and child parents (CPFP). Although the aim of both approaches is to relieve insufficient fees, they differ significantly in their approach, feasibility and functionality.
What are the By-Fee and CPFP?
BY-Fee (RBF) is an evidence (POS) consensus algorithm, which aims to reduce transaction costs by encouraging validators to participate in the network. It works as follows:
- Validators with a high stake balance are selected to create new blocks.
- Each valider has been given an individual number of signs based on their contribution.
- The block includes a prize for each hour that can be used or used to pay other validators.
Children’s Parents (CPFP) is an alternative solution that tries to alleviate the problem of insufficient payments by utilizing the concept of parental relationships in traditional social networks. This is how it works:
- The older node (or “father”) has a large number of children (or “children”).
- Children will be encouraged to reward marks to validate their parents’ transactions.
- Children can then pay each other’s rewards to validate events by creating an effectively decentralized network.
The Benefits and Disadvantages of RBF:
Pro:
- Scalability : RBF allows the Ethereum network to scaling by allowing validators to participate in the network without restricting their stake weight.
- Compatibility : The RBF protocol can easily integrate other blockchain networks, which makes it a diverse solution to different use cases.
Cons:
- Energy consumption : RBF requires significant computational force and energy consumption, which can lead to environmental problems.
- Safety Risks : Because reward marks are used for validation, there is a risk of “marking” or “re -marking” attacks where harmful actors can manipulate the network.
Benefits and Disadvantages of CPFP:
Pro:
- low energy consumption : CPFP is designed to be energy efficient, which makes it an attractive solution to environmental conscious projects.
- Improved scalability : By utilizing children’s nodes as validators, CPFP gives more participants the opportunity to participate in the network without restricting the stake balance.
Cons:
- Limited scalability : Although CPFP can provide a decentralized solution, its scalability restrictions can still prevent large -scale deployment.
- Concentration applies to
: CPFP’s parents and child relationship raises concentration and a small group for a small group that dominates effective nodes.
Current Status:
Both RBF and CPFP have made significant development and testing. Although they are currently functional, their adoption rates vary greatly between projects and communities.
- Ethereum’s RBF protocol has one of the most prominent implementations of the By-Fee.
- In other Blockchain networks, such as polkaot and cosmos, also use different variants of RBF or similar solutions.
Conclusion:
Both replace the award (RBF) and the Children’s Fees (CPFP) propose innovative solutions to alleviate insufficient payments in Blockchain. However, their approaches differ considerably when RBF relies on the balance of the stake, while the CPFP uses parents’ relationships as a mechanism of validation fees. Ethereum’s ecosystem continues to develop, we can expect both protocols to continue to improve and expand their functionality.
Are both of them currently functional?
Yes, all three proposals are currently in development or testing.